Digitisation and Geographical Technologies for Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of “Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures” Advancements in Mexico and Italy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36253/bsgi-7613Keywords:
OECMs, Digitisation, Geographic technologies, Conservation, Participatory governanceAbstract
This article analyses the transformative potential of digitalisation and geographic technologies in advancing Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs) through a comparative analysis between Mexico and Italy. The research addresses the gap identified in the literature regarding the practical application of digital tools for recognising and managing OECMs in various geographical and institutional contexts. Specific objectives include: (1) assessing how geographic technologies support the identification of potential OECMs; (2) analysing differences in national approaches to OECM recognition; (3) identifying opportunities and challenges in integrating digital tools with participatory governance.
Metrics
References
Adams, W. M. (2020). Geographies of Conservation III: Nature’s Spaces. Progress in Human Geography, 44(4), 789-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519837779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132519837779
Agnesi et al. (2024). Superfice nazionale protetta terrestre e marina. Roma, Istituto Superiore per la Protezione e la Ricerca Ambientale. https://indicatoriambientali.isprambiente.it/it/aree-tutelate/superficie-nazionale-protetta-terrestre-e-marina
Agnesi, S. et al. (2020). Spatial Analysis of Marine Protected Area Networks in Europe’s Seas III. ETC/ ICM Technical Report 3/2020: European Topic Centre on Inland, Coastal and Marine waters. https://www.eionet.europa.eu/etcs/etc-icm/products/etc-icm-reports/etc-icm-report-3-2020-spatial-analysis-of-marine-protected-area-networks-in-europe2019s-seas-iii
Alves-Pinto et al. (2021). Opportunities and Challenges of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs) for Biodiversity Conservation. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 19(2), 115-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.01.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecon.2021.01.004
Azzari, M. et al. (2021). Virtual Reconstruction of Historical Landscapes: A 3D Environment to Contextualise Data in Space and Time. Abstracts of the International Cartographic Association, 3, 17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-17-2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/ica-abs-3-17-2021
Bailey J. J. Cunningham, C. A., Griffin, D. C., Hoppit, G., et al. (2022). Protected Areas and Nature Recovery. Achieving the goal to protect 30% of UK land and seas for nature by 2030. London, British Ecological Society. www.britishecologicalsociety.org/protectedareas
Bakker, K. et al. (2020). Digital Technologies and Dynamic Resource Management, 2020 IEEE International Conference on Smart Computing, Piscataway, IEE Computer Society, 368–373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP50058.2020.00079 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/SMARTCOMP50058.2020.00079
Bassi, M. (2022). Territories of Life in Europe: Towards a Classification of the Rural Commons for Biodiversity Conservation. Antropologia Pubblica, 8(2), 102-121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1473/anpub.v8i2.279
Beazley, L. et al. (2021). Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measure Promotes Recovery in a Cold-water Coral Reef. Global Ecology and Conservation, 26, e01485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01485 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2021.e01485
Bezaury-Creel, J. E. (2024). Privately Protected Areas in Mexico, a 2012–2023 Update. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 4, Article 1304771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1304771 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1304771
Brenner, L., Job, H. (2022). Reviewing the Participatory Management of UNESCO Biosphere Reserves: What do We Miss by Ignoring Local Academic Knowledge in Mexico? Ambio, 51(8), 1726-1738. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01672-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01672-1
Capineri, C. (2023). Quale tecnologia per quale geografia, quale geografia con quale tecnologia. In Lazzeroni, M. et al. (Eds.), Geografia e tecnologia: Transizioni, trasformazioni, rappresentazioni. Memorie geografiche, 22, Firenze, Società di Studi Geografici, 17-22.
Casagrande, G., Sik, A., Gergely, S. (Eds., 2018). Small Flying Drones: Applications for Geographic Observation. Berlin, Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66577-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66577-1_1
Cazzolla Gatti, R. et al. (2024). EU2030 Biodiversity Strategy: Unveiling Gaps in the Coverage of Ecoregions and Threatened Species Within the Strictly Protected Areas of Italy. Journal for Nature Conservation, 79, 126621. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2024.126621
China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development Secretariat (2023). Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Conservation. In: Green Recovery with Resilience and High-Quality Development. In China Council for International Cooperation on Environment and Development Secretariat. Green Recovery with Resilience and High- Quality Development. CCICED Annual Policy Report 2021. Singapore, Berlin, Springer, 59-124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9470-8_2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9470-8_2
Comitato per il Capitale Naturale. (2022). Quinto rapporto sullo stato del capitale naturale in Italia. Roma, Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Sicurezza Energetica. Retrieved from: https://www.mase.gov.it/sites/default/files/archivio/allegati/CapitaleNaturale/V_Rapporto_CN.pdf
Convention on Biological Diversity (2018). Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the CBD 14/8. Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity Fourteenth meeting, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, 17-29 November.
Cook, C. N. (2024). Progress Developing the Concept of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. Conservation Biology, 38(1), e14106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14106 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.14106
Custodio, J., Abeledo, H. (2023). Drone-Based Environmental Emergency Response in the Brazilian Amazon. Drones, 7(9), 554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7090554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/drones7090554
D’Antoni, S. (2022). Aree protette, un pilastro della conservazione. Ecoscienza, Rivista dell’Agenzia regionale prevenzione, ambiente ed energia dell’Emilia-Romagna, 13(2), 2022. https://www.arpae.it/it/ecoscienza/numeri-ecoscienza/anno-2022/numero-2-anno-2022/biodiversita/dantoni_es2022_2-1.pdf
D’Antoni, S. et al. (2023). Criteri per l’individuazione di aree da sottoporre a tutela per il raggiungimento degli obiettivi della Strategia Europea per la Biodiversità al 2030. Reticula, 32, 5-23. https://www.isprambiente.gov.it/files2023/pubblicazioni/periodici-tecnici/reticula/reticula_32.pdf
Dalton, D. T., Pascher, K., Berger, V., Steinbauer, K., Jungmeier, M. (2021). Novel Technologies and Their application for Protected Area Management: A Supporting Approach in Biodiversity Monitoring. In Suratman, M. N. (Ed.), Protected Area Management - Recent Advances. London, IntechOpen, 571-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99889 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99889
Dalton, D. T., Berger, V., Adams, V. et al (2022). A Conceptual Framework for Biodiversity Monitoring Programs in Conservation Areas. Sustainability, 15(8), 6779. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086779 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086779
Danielsen, F., Eicken, H., Funder, M. et al. (2022). Community Monitoring of Natural Resource Systems and the Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 47, 637-670. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022325 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-022325
David, J. et al. (2021). Application of Remote Sensing Tools to Assess the Land Use and Land Cover Change in Coatzacoalcos, Veracruz, Mexico. Applied Sciences, 12 (4), 1882. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041882 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/app12041882
De Marchi et al. (2022). Drones and Geographical Information Technologies in Agroecology and Organic Farming: Contributions to Technological Sovereignty. Boca Raton, CRC Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052842
De Marchi, M. et al. (Eds., 2021). Geografie in movimento: Strumenti, tecnologie, dati GIS, luoghi, sensori, attori (Vol. 5). XXXIII Congresso Geografico Italiano, Padova, 8-13 settembre 2021.
De Marchi, M., Pappalardo, S. E. (2023). Drones for Good, tecnologie dell’informazione geografica e processi di empowerment. In Lazzeroni, M. et al. (Eds.). Geografia e tecnologia: Transizioni, trasformazioni, rappresentazioni. Firenze, Società di Studi Geografici, 769-774.
Di Minin, E. et al. (2022). Quantitative Conservation Geography. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 37(1), 42-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.09.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2021.08.009
Domínguez, J. C. et al. (2022). Back to the Future. Smart Technologies and the Sustainable Development Goals. In Kurz, H. D. et al. The Routledge Handbook of Smart Technologies. London, Routledge, 537-554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429351921-32
Donald, P. F. et al. (2019). The Prevalence, Characteristics and Effectiveness of Aichi Target 11’s “Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures” (OECMs) in Key Biodiversity Areas. Conservation Letters, 12 (5), e12659. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12659 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12659
Dudley, N. et al. (2018). The Essential Role of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures in Achieving Big Bold Conservation Targets. Global Ecology and Conservation, 15, e00424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2018.e00424
European Commission. (2020). EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Bringing nature back into our lives (COM(2020) 380 final). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of the Regions. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0380
European Environment Agency. (2021). Assess the Potential of Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures as a Driver for Landscape-level Conservation and Connectivity in the EU. UNEP-WCMC, IEEP, and Trinomics report. Retrieved from: https://biodiversity.europa.eu/europes-biodiversity/protected-areas-archived/other-effective-area-based-conservation-measures/final_report_oecms_in_eu_submitted_2021031.pdf/@@download/file
Fitzsimons, J. A. et al. (2024). Editorial: Advances in Privately Protected Areas. Frontiers in Conservation Science, 5, 1441046 https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2024.1441046 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2024.1441046
Fraisl, D. et al. (2022). Citizen Science in Environmental and Ecological Sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers 2(1), 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00144-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00158-y
Frascaroli, F. et al. (2019). Sacred Natural Sites in Italy Have Landscape Characteristics Complementary to Protected Areas: Implications for Policy and Planning. Applied Geography, 113, 102100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2019.102100
Fu, B. (2020). Promoting Geography for Sustainability. Geography and Sustainability, 1(1), 1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.02.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.02.003
Fujihira, K. (2023). Sustainable Land Development: Biodiversity, Natural Disasters, and Topographic Gradient. In Almusaed, A., Almssad, A. Sustainable Regional Planning. London, IntechOpen DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110235
Gabriele, M. et al. (2023). A Combined GIS and Remote Sensing Approach for Monitoring Climate Change-related Land Degradation to Support Landscape Preservation and Planning Tools: The Basilicata Case Study. Applied Geomatics, 15, 497-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00437-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00437-z
Gallina, S. et al. (2022). Contribution of Wildlife Management Units to the Conservation of Terrestrial Mammals in Southeastern Mexico. Mammalian Biology, 102, 205-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00220-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42991-021-00220-4
Garnett, S. T. et al. (2018). A Spatial Overview of the Global Importance of Indigenous Lands for Conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1(7), 369-374. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6
Giordano, A. (2026). Italy’s Demographic Shift and Global Innovation: Navigating Geopolitical and Geoeconomic Strategies in Technological Competition. In Munoz, J. M. (Ed.). The Geopolitics and Geoeconomics of Technology. London, Routledge, 147-156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003568810-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003568810-19
González, N. C., Kröger, M. (2022). The Adoption of Earth-observation Technologies for Deforestation Monitoring by Indigenous People: Evidence from the Amazon. Globalizations, 20(3), 415-431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2093556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2093556
Gurney, G. G. et al. (2021). Biodiversity Needs Every Tool in the Box: Use OECMs. Nature, 595 (7869), 646-649. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02041-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-021-02041-4
Hermoso, V. et al. (2021). The EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030: Opportunities and Challenges on the Path Towards Biodiversity Recovery. Environmental Science & Policy, 127, 263–271 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.028
Hoffmann, S. (2022). Challenges and Opportunities of Area-based Conservation in Reaching Biodiversity and Sustainability Goals. Biodiversity Conservation 31, 325–352 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02340-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-021-02340-2
ICES. (2021). ICES/IUCN-CEM FEG Workshop on Testing OECM Practices and Strategies (WKTOPS). ICES Scientific Reports, 3 (42) https://doi.org/10.17895/ices.pub.8135
IUCN-WCPA Task Force on OECMs (2019). Recognising and Reporting Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures. Gland, IUCN https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PATRS.3.en DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.PATRS.3.en
Jackson, T. D. et al. (2020). Three-dimensional Digital Mapping of Ecosystems: A New Era in Spatial Ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287(1921), 20192383 https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.2383
Jonas, H. D., et al. (Eds.) (2024). Guidance on Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures (OECMs). IUCN WCPA Good Practice Series, No.36. Gland, Switzerland https://doi.org/10.2305/LAAW4624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/LAAW4624
Jonas, H., et al. (2017). Will ‘Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures’ Increase Recognition and Support for ICCAs? Parks, 23(2), 63–78 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-2HDJ.en DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2017.PARKS-23-2HDJ.en
Jouan, P., Hallot, P. (2020). Digital Twin: Research Framework to Support Preventive Conservation Policies. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(4), 228 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9040228
Kondratenko, I. et al. (2023). The Use of Information Technology in Ecology Across Different Countries. E3S Web of Conferences, Digital Technologies in Education for Sustainable Development, 398, 03009 https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341903009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341903009
Lahoz-Monfort, J. J., Magrath, M. J. L. (2021). A Comprehensive Overview of Technologies for Species and Habitat Monitoring and Conservation. BioScience, 71(10), 1038–1062. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab073 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biab073
Lauche, B. (2011). Guidelines for Protected Area Legislation. Gland, International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).
Lewis, A. H. et al. (2023). Coverage and Beyond: How Can Private Governance Support Key Elements of the Global Biodiversity Framework’s Target 3? Frontiers in Conservation Science, 4, 130380. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1303801 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2023.1303801
López-Ramírez, S. M. et al (2020). Land Use Change Effects on Catchment Streamflow Response in a Humid Tropical Montane Cloud Forest Region, Central Veracruz, Mexico. Hydrological Processes, 34(16), 3555-3570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.13800
Lucatello, S., Alcántara-Ayala, I. (2024). Sustainable Synergy: Strengthening Disaster Risk Reduction in Latin America and the Caribbean Through Nature-based Solutions. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 113, 104860. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104860 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104860
MacKinnon, K. et al. (2020a). Protected and Other Conserved Areas: Ensuring the Future of Forest Biodiversity in a Changing Climate. International Forestry Review, 22(S1), 93-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554820829523943 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1505/146554820829523943
MacKinnon, K. et al. (2020b). Strengthening the Global System of Protected Areas post-2020: A Perspective from the IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas. Parks Stewardship Forum, 36(2), 296–281. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5070/P536248273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5070/P536248273
Magdalena, U. R., Amorim, R. R. (2022). Spatial Analysis Guiding Decision Making in Environmental Conservation: Systematic Conservation Planning and Ecosystem services. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 47(1), 123-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333221112409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03091333221112409
March Mifsut I. J. (2023). Avances de Mexico en la Meta 3 “30X30”, Comisión Nacional de Áreas
Maxwell, S. L. et al. (2020). Area-based Conservation in the Twenty-first Century. Nature, 586(7828), 217-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2773-z
Mitchell, B. A. et al. (2018). PPA or OECM? Differentiating Between Privately Protected Areas and Other Effective Area-based Conservation Measures on Private Land. Parks (24) 49-60. DOI: 10.2305/iucn.ch.2018.parks-24-sibam.en DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-SIBAM.en
Monzón Alvarado, C. M. et al. (2020). Integrating Public Participation in Knowledge Generation Processes: Evidence from Citizen Science Initiatives in Mexico. Environmental Science & Policy, 114, 230-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.08.007
Moreira, F. et al. (2024). Guidelines for Connectivity Conservation and Planning in Europe with Supporting Web-based Inventory and Databases (D6.1). NaturaConnect, Sofia, ARPHA Preprints. https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e129021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e129021
Naturales Protegidas. www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/media/1/pais/files/2_CONANP_PI_2023.pdf
Naumann, S. et al. (2021). Protected Area Management in the EU: Supporting the Advancement of the Trans-European Nature Network (ETC/BD Technical Paper No. 3/2021), Copenhagen, European Environment Agency https://www.ecologic.eu/sites/default/files/publication/2022/34004-Protected-area-management-in-the-EU-web.pdf
Negret, P. J. et al. (2024). Potential of Different Governance Mechanisms for Achieving Global Biodiversity Framework Goals, 04 April, Preprint (Version 1). Durham, Research Square. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4170734/v1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4170734/v1
Nieto-Mora, D. A. et al. (2023). Systematic Review of Machine Learning Methods Applied to Ecoacoustics and Soundscape Monitoring. Heliyon, 9(10), e20275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20275
Nowak, M. M. et al. (2020). Mobile GIS Applications for Environmental Field Surveys: A State of the Art. Global Ecology and Conservation, 23, e01089. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01089 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e01089
Peña-Azcona, A. et al. (2022). Voluntary Conservation Areas in Mexico: Scope and Challenges. Revista de Ciencias Ambientales, 36 (2), e5129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.56-2.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15359/rca.56-2.7
Perazzoni, F., Painho, M. (2020). Geointelligence Against Illegal Deforestation and Timber Laundering in the Brazilian Amazon. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(6), 398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9060398 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9060398
Perera-Valderrama, S. et al. (2023). Mexico on Track to Protect 30% of its Marine Area by 2030. Sustainability, 15(19), 14101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914101
Petza, D. et al. (2024). Assessing the Potential of Other Effective Area-Based Conservation Measures (OECMs) for Contributing to Conservation targets: A Global Scoping Review Protocol. Open Research Europe, 3, 118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16116.3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16116.3
Pozzer, G. et al. (2021). Remote sensing e spatial modelling per strategie di adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici: caso studio Valle Savio. In Atti della XXI Conferenza Nazionale ASITA, Milano, 108-115.
Rabitz, F. et al. (2022). Emerging Technologies in Biodiversity Governance: Gaps and Opportunities for Transformative Governance. In Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Kok, M. T. J. (Eds.). Transforming Biodiversity Governance. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 137-154. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856348 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108856348.008
Radočaj, D. et al. (2020). Global Open Data Remote Sensing Satellite Missions for Land Monitoring and Conservation: A Review. Land, 9(11), 402. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land9110402
Ramos Castillo, A., Tugendhat, H. (2021). Indigenous Peoples, Local Communities and Area-based Conservation Targets: A Briefing for the Post-2020 Global Biodiversity Framework. ICCA Consortium. https://www.iccaconsortium.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/oecms_5.pdf
Ranius, T. et al. (2023). Protected Area Designation and Management in a World of Climate Change: A Review of Recommendations. Ambio 52, 68-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01779-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-022-01779-z
Reygadas, Y. et al. (2018). Forest Degradation Assessment Based on Trend Analysis of MODIS-Leaf Area Index: A Case Study in Mexico. Remote Sensing, 11(21), 2503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11212503
Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D., Martínez-Vega, J. (2022). Effectiveness of Protected Areas in Conserving Biodiversity: A Worldwide Review. Berlin, Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94297-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94297-7
Santarsiero, V. et al. (2022). Remote Sensing and Spatial Analysis for Land-take assessment in Basilicata Region (Southern Italy). Remote Sensing, 14 (7), 1692. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071692 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14071692
Schröter, M. et al. (2023). Science on Ecosystems and People to Support the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework. Ecosystems and People, 19(1), 2220913. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2220913 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2023.2220913
Shabtay, A. et al. (2019). Promoting Ancillary Conservation Through Marine Spatial Planning. Science of The Total Environment, 651, 1753-1763. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.074 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.074
Shinbrot, X. A. et al. (2020). Quiahua, the First Citizen Science Rainfall Monitoring Network in Mexico: Filling Critical Gaps in Rainfall Data for Evaluating a Payment for Hydrologic Services Program. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 1-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.316 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.316
Shirvani Dastgerdi, A. et al. (2020). Toward an Innovative Strategic Approach for Sustainable Management of Natural Protected Areas in Italy. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 13(4), 49-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-143
Spinetti, C. et al. (2019). Landslide Susceptibility Mapping by Remote Sensing and Geomorphological Data: Case studies on the Sorrentina Peninsula (Southern Italy). GIScience & Remote Sensing, 56(6), 940-965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2019.1587891 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2019.1587891
UNEP-WCMC (2024). Protected Planet. Retrieved from https://www.protectedplanet.net/country/MEX (Mexico), and https://www.protectedplanet.net/country/ITA (Italy).
Wang, H. et al. (2023). Application of GIS and Remote-sensing Technology in Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation. In Bhatti, A. I. et al. (Eds.). Deep Learning for Multimedia Processing Applications: Volume One – Image Security and Intelligent Systems for Multimedia Processing. London, Routledge, 284-321. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/978103254824 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781032646268-12
World Wildlife Fund (2024). Gobiernos de Chile y México presentan hoja de ruta para conservar al menos el 30% de sus aguas continentales y áreas terrestres y costero-marinas. 29 October, World Wildlife Fund. Retrieved from https://www.worldwildlife.org/descubre-wwf/historias/gobiernos-de-chile-y-mexico-presentan-hoja-de-ruta-para-conservar-al-menos-el-30-de-sus-aguas-continentales-y-areas-terrestres-y-costero-marinas
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Alfonso Giordano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
